2026:JHHC:17555 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1644 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1644 of 2026 ---- Sambhu Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma, S/o Ashok Sharma, aged about 30 years, R/o Topsia Road, South Gobind Khatik Road, Kolkata, PO – Gobind Khatik Road, PS – Topsia, District – Kolkata, West Bengal .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Advocate ---- 02/17.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tundi P.S. Case No.65 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned J.M., Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner was not knowing how the amount of Rs.3,70,000/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.10 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer 2026:JHHC:17555 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1644 of 2026 and submits that the said amount has been credited in the account of the petitioner and the petitioner is said to be associates of the other accused persons, who are named in the FIR. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the FIR itself it has been stated the from the account of Kumardih Aajiwika Mahila Sankul Sangathan the said amount has been transferred in the account of the petitioner and the petitioner is said to be accomplice of the other accused persons and the allegations are there that the amount has been transferred by way of illegally utilizing cheque of the said Sangathan. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.06.2026 Sangam/