APHC010074662014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28494/2014 Between: 1. M/S. SRI VENKATA SAITEJ MODERN RICE MILL, REP BY THE PRO MR.JAMI VENKATESWAR RAO, R/O.RAGHUNADHAPURAM VILLAGE, TEKKALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP BY THE SECRETARY INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DEPT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. ASST DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, OPP TO APSRTC DEPOT, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order/s or Direction/s more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing notice is bad by cancel the same the proceedings 3626/VIG/2012, dt.28-06- 2014 issued by the respondent by dropping further actions if any as the same is illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violation of principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 35664 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist for collecting the amounts mentioned in 2 their proceedings no.3626/VIG/2012, dated:28-06-2014 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K PURUSHOTHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28494/2014 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the proceeding sheet that there was no representation for the petitioner on 13.08.2024 and 05.02.2026. The matter is posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.02.2026 TTPPSS 4 73 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28494/2014 09.02.2026 TTPPSS