Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16991 (AP)

Chilaka Koteswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4242/2026 · 2026-02-15

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010071572026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4242/2026 Between: 1. CHILAKA KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O.VENKAIAH @ ASHIRVADAM, AGED 43, YEARS, OCC. PVT.EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.3-51, BUTTAIGUDEM VILLAGE-534 448, SC COLONY, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL, ELURU (W.G) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI-522 237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT-534 001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT- 534 001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DWARAKATIRUMALA, MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534 426. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus and declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 are highly illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and clear violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and principles of natural Justice and consequently to direct the respondents 2 and 4 to consider 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.4242 of 2026 the Petitioners representations dt. 17.01.2026 and 22.09.2025 for mutation of petitioners name in online IB Webland Adangal/Phahani in the revenue records an extent of Ac 0.92 cents in Sy.No.329/3 and an extent of Ac 0.70 cents in Sy.No.330/5 Totally an extent of Ac 1.62 cents in Narayanapuram Revenue Village, Dwarakatirumal Mandal, Eluru District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the Petitioner’s representations dt.17.01.2026 and 22.09.2025 for mutation petitioner’s online IB VVebland Adangal/Phahani in the revenue records an extent of Ac 0.92 cents in Sy.No.329/3 and an extent of Ac 0.70 cents in Sy.No.330/5 Totally an extent of Ac 1.62 cents in Narayanapuram Revenue Village, Dwarakatirumal Mandal, Eluru District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANDA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.4242 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the petitioner’s representations dated 17.01.2026 and 22.09.2025 for mutation of the pettioner’s name in online 1B Webland Adangal/Pahani in the revenue records in an extent of Ac 0.92 cents in Sy.No.329/3 and Ac 0.70 cents in Sy.No.330/5 in a total extent of Ac.1.62 cents of Narayanapuram Revenue Village, Dwarakatirumal Mandal, Eluru District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 14.02.2026 submits that already an endorsement was issued by the 4th respondent, dated 01.12.2025 for the relief sought by the petitioner herein. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition as the endorsement was already given by the 4th respondent, dated 01.12.2025 acting upon the representation of the petitioner submitted through PGRS in the office of the 2nd respondent. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the said “endorsement” it is open for the petitioner to appeal against it, in accordance with law if so warranted and if so advised. The 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.4242 of 2026 written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 14.02.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 16.02.2026 RMD 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.4242 of 2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4242/2026 16.02.2026 RMD