( 2026:JHHC:17845 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3182 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3182 of 2026 Md. Sanaur Rahman @ Sanaur Rahman, aged about 34 years, son of Md. Atauddin Ansari, resident of Village- Sarkardih, P.O. Sarkardih, P.S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ----- 02/19.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.36 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working as a Manager in Labbaik Tour and Travels Company. He next submits that the allegations are made that in the year 2019, the petitioner has given service of the said travel agency to the informant and he was asked to go to Delhi to travel for Umrah Hajj to Saudi Arabia, however, when the informant went to Delhi, ticket was not provided to the informant. He also submits that the allegations are of the year 2019, however, the FIR has been lodged in the year 2022. He further submits that the amount was not directly paid to the petitioner, however, the proprietor of the said company has given sum of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner. He also submits that the proprietor of the said travel company has faced the trial and he has been acquitted by the learned Court. ( 2026:JHHC:17845 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3182 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there that the petitioner has taken money and the tour program was not materialized. 5. Considering that the petitioner was said to be Manager of Labbaik Tour and Travel Company and the occurrence is of the year 2019, whereas, the FIR has been lodged in the year 2022 and further, the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 21 of this application and the proprietor of the said company has been acquitted by the learned Court and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.36 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 19th June, 2026 Ajay/