Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010227382026 2026:GAU-AS:15827 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5793/2026 MD JIYAUR PASA S/O LATE SALIM PASA, NALBARI TOWN, WARD NO. 8, P.S. P.O. NALBARI, DISTRICT NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN 781335 VERSUS AXIS BANK LIMITED A BANKING COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT AND REGULATED UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT TRISHUL, 3RD FLOOR, OPP. SAMARTHESHWAR TEMPLE, NEAR LAW GARDEN, ELLISBRIDGE, AHMEDABAD 380006, GUJARAT, REPR 2:THE BRANCH HEAD AXIS BANK LIMITED NALBARI BRANCH CHOUDHURY COMPLEX WARD NO. 6 N.T. ROAD P.O. P.S. NALBARI DISTRICT NALBARI ASSAM 781335. 3:THE AUTHORISED OFFICER HEAD LOAN CENTRE AXIS BANK LIMITED BHANGAGARH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI 781005 ASSAM 4:THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Page No.# 2/3 REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH MARG FORT MUMBAI 400001 HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT STATION ROAD PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM. 5:THE OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK INTEGRATED OMBUDSMAN SCHEME 2021 OFFICE OF THE RBI OMBUDSMAN GUWAHATI STATION ROAD PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 6:TRANSUNION CIBIL LIMITED ONE INDIABULLS CENTRE TOWER 2A 19TH FLOOR SENAPATI BAPAT MARG ELPhinstone ROAD WEST MUMBAI 400013 MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Advocate for the Petitioner : MD S HOQUE, MR. WAHID AKHTAR,FARMIDA AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AXIS BANK LTD., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 15.10.2026 Heard Mr. S. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the respondent Axis Bank Page No.# 3/3 Limited has already filed an original application, O.A. no. 66/2025 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati for recovery of Rs. 27,35,132.76 preceded by Section 13[2] of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest [SARFAESI] Act, 2002 Act on 29.04.2026. As those documents are not made part of this writ petition, Mr. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Mr. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank has submitted that he has no objection to the submission made by Mr. Hoque. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to the petitioner to file afresh with the afore-mentioned documents and other relevant documents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant