Paruchuri Uma Maheswari v. State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/1280/2021 · 2026-01-30
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010071982021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1280/2021 Between:
1. PARUCHURI UMA MAHESWARI,, WIFE OF KISHORE BABU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 3-376/18, APSP-VI BN ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. PARUCHURI KISHORE BABU,, SON OF SRIRAMULU , AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 3-376/18, APSP-VI BN ROAD, MANGALAGIRI
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI.
2. CHAPPARAPU NAVYA TEJA, WIFE OF SATISH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CUMBUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. (DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.1280 of 2021 Dated 31.01.2026
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/Accused Nos.4 and 5 in C.C.No.424 of 2020 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Giddalur, Prakasam District, in Crime No.142 of 2020 of Cumbum Police Station, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498-A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘the IPC’) and Sections 3 &4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. No representation for the petitioners; even on the last occasion also there was no representation for the petitioners. Notice on respondent No. 2 has also not been taken for the past five years. Even though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal,’ there is no representation for the petitioners.
3. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 31.01.2026 RSI
3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.1280 of 2021 Dated 31.01.2026
64 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1280 of 2021
Date: 31.01.2026
RSI