Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16971 (JHR)

MD HUISSAIN ALIAS MD HUSSAIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3876/2026 · 2026-06-16

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17363 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3876 of 2026 Md. Hussain @ Md. Hussain Ansari, aged about 26 years, S/o:- Late Baksu Mian … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 05/16.06.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 111(i)(III), 318(4), 319(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 & Section 66(b), 66(c), 66(d) of I.T. Act and 42(3)(e) of Telecommunications Act, 2023 pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge has already been framed on 12.06.2026, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and one mobile and one SIM has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and also one victim has been identified. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are six complaints against the petitioner in the portal. However, other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. He has also submitted that the bail application of the co- accused have been rejected by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 in B.A. No. 3190 of 2026. 5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the case of the co-accused numerous first information report have 2026:JHHC:17363 2 been found registered, which is not the case so far as the present petitioner is concerned. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent and charge having already been framed, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 16.06.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-18.06.2026