2026:JHHC:17455 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4630 of 2019 1. Central Board of Trustee, Employees Provident Fund, through Prabhat Sinha, S/o Late K.N. Sinha the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Legal), Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office at Ranchi, having its office at Bhagirathi Complex, near Circuit House, Karmatoli, P.O and P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi. 2. Assistant, Provident Fund Commissioner (Compliance) Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office Ranchi, having its office at Bhagirathi Complex, near Circuit House, Karmatoli, P.O and P.S. Lalpur, District- Ranchi. .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. M/s R.C. Hazra Memorial Hospital, through its partner Dr. Bikash Hazra, son of Dr. C.C. Hazara, Telephone Exchange Road, P.O and P.S and District- Dhanbad. 2. M/s Hospital for women, through its partner Dr. Bikash Hazra, son of Dr. C.C. Hazara, Telephone Exchange Road, P.O and P.S and District- Dhanbad. 3. Sri S. Taye, son of not known to the petitioners, presently working and posted as Registrar, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II at Dhanbad-cum-Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal having its office at CGIT-cum-Labour Court NO. 2, Shram Bhawan, Murlinagar, Jagjivan Nagar, P.O Dhanbad 826003 P.S. Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad. . … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate. For the respondent(s): ------ 10/16.06.2026 Since the case No. IT-2/5/2019 is still pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Dhanbad, I direct the petitioners, herein, who are the respondents before the Tribunal, to impress the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal filed by M/s Hazra Memorial Hospital and another at the earliest. 2. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that the recovery made by the petitioners was treated to be the pre-deposit and the aforesaid appeal has been admitted. 3. The petitioners, in this writ petition, have prayed for setting aside the part of the order 20th May, 2019 passed in Case No. IT 2/5/2019, whereby, the Registrar of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. - II, Dhanbad stayed the recovery proceeding. 4. Since, now the Tribunal has already stayed the recovery proceeding, in this writ application, I am not deciding the validity of this type of order and the jurisdiction of the registrar to stay the recovery proceeding, the issue of jurisdiction is kept open, which can be decided in appropriate case. It is made clear that the appeal should be decided as early as possible, preferrable within a period of three months from today. It is also made clear that if the appellant does not co-operate, it will be open to the Tribunal to proceed ex parte against the appellant or may pass an appropriate order including the dismissal of the appeal for non-appearance. 5. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. 6. The petitioners will produce the copy of this order before the Tribunal. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 16th June, 2026 Anu/ SKC-Cp2.