Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16969 (JHR)

UPENDRA PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3175/2026 · 2026-06-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17728 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 3175 of 2026 ---- Upendra Paswan, aged about 20 years son of Arjun Kumar Ram, resident of Village Chinia, PO and PS Chinia, District Garhwa, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Advocate ---- 2/18.06.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garhwa PS Case No.122 of 2026, for offence registered under section 103(1) and 338/3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no eye- witness and false allegations are made against the petitioner of murdering the deceased and he next submits that the deceased has committed suicide, and on these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that soon after the occurrence the petitioner was absconding and even the petitioner has switched-off his mobile phone and in view of that, prima facie, the petitioner was involved in the crime and on these grounds, anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 2026:JHHC:17728 2 5. It has been found that that the learned Sessions Judge that the injury mark on the body of the deceased does not suggest a case of suicide and the witnesses examined at paragraph nos.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 have supported the occurrence against the petitioner and Durgesh Yadav. Thus, the involvement of the petitioner, prima facie, is there and in view of that, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and as such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected and consequently, this anticipatory bail application being ABA No.3175 of 2026 is hereby dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 18.06.2026 SI/