Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16969 (BOM)

GANPAT KANU MENDADKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

WP/5205/2005 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

wp-5205-05.doc Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5205 OF 2005 Ganpat Kanu Mendadkar …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and ors. …Respondents ---------- Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner. ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J. FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. DATE : 9 October 2026 P.C. : 1. Matter is mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. By praecipe bearing today’s date, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner prays for Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 01/10/2026. 3. In 6th line of paragraph 11 of the said Order, the words “Scrutiny Committee” are required to be replaced by the words 1/2 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2026.10.09 18:54:42 +0530 wp-5205-05.doc “Competent Authority”. Further, in the 2nd last line of paragraph 11, the words “Caste Validity Certificate” are required to be replaced by the words “Caste Certificate”. Likewise, in the 3rd line of paragraph 14 of the said Order, the words “Validity Certificate” are required to be replaced by the words “Caste Certificate”. 4. The said Order dated 01/10/2026 stands corrected accordingly. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [R.I. CHAGLA J.] 2/2