SHRI BARALU SHETTIGOWDA ASHOK v. THE ASSESSMENT UNIT
WP/12491/2026 · 2026-04-22
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16964 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16964 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21914 WP No. 12491 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 12491 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
SHRI. BARALU SHETTIGOWDA ASHOK SON OF SHRI SRI SETTI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.08, DHEAAMNTH MOTHER THERESA ROAD, VIDYANAGAR, BEERANAHALLI, HASSAN, KARNATAKA-573201.
PAN NO:ADNPA0714H. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRANAY SHARMA Y., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2ND FLOOR, E/RAMP, JAWARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI-110003.
2.
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1 AND TPS HASSAN, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 2ND STAGE, BELUR ROAD, HASSAN, KARNATAKA - 572301. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21914 WP No. 12491 of 2026
3.
THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, GROUND FLOOR, RING ROAD, BELURU - BENGALURU ROAD, VIDYANAGAR, HASSAN - 573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.01.2026 PASSED UNDER SECTION 144 R.W.S 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING DIN NO.
ITBA/AST/S/114/2025-26/1084970517(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21914 WP No. 12491 of 2026 ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel, Sri. Thirumalesh accepts notice for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has called in question the validity of the assessment order at Annexure-A1 as well as the computation sheet at Annexure-A2 and demand notice at Annexure-A3. The petitioner has also sought for allied reliefs as well.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the assessment order is an exparte order, insofar as all communications are stated to have been sent to the old address i.e., House No.36, Baralu Village, Baralu Post, Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassan-573116. It is submitted that the petitioner had intimated regarding change of address in terms of e-filing as at Annexure-H, wherein it is pointed out that the new address would be No.08, Dheemanth Mother Teresa Road, Vidyanagar, Haasan, Beeranahalli, Haasan-573201. It is submitted that in light
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21914 WP No. 12491 of 2026 of the same, petitioner was not in a position to make out reply to the show-cause notice.
4. It is further submitted that the revenue was aware of such notice as insofar as attachment of bank account is concerned, copy of the communication addressed to the Bank Manager was addressed to the corrected address. Accordingly, it is submitted that the
order may be set aside and matter remitted to the stage of reply to notice issued under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
5.
Learned counsel for the revenue submits that the petitioner has participated in the appeal proceedings and accordingly, it cannot be said that petitioner was unaware. As regards such contention, petitioner submits that the address shown in the assessment order is the old address, which is different from the address updated at Annexure-H.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21914 WP No. 12491 of 2026
6. In light of the contention raised and noticing that the assessment order is passed on the basis of material available in possession of the respondents without benefit of any reply of the petitioner, it would be appropriate to re-open the proceedings.
7. Accordingly, the orders at Annexures-A1 to A3 are set aside. The matter is remitted to the stage of reply to notice issued under Section 142(1). In light of the order passed setting aside the orders at Annexures-A1 to A3, authorities to rescind recovery proceedings addressed to the banks as evidenced at Annexure-B, forthwith. All
contentions on merits are kept open. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR