APHC010074852026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4405/2026 Between: 1. DUGGIRALA SURAMMA,, W/O. GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-225/A, PEDALANKA VILLAGE KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521344 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT - 534006 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521002 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALIDINDI REVENUE DIVISION, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521344 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521344 6. DUGGIRALA LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE DUGGIRALA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. BOMMALAGUDI ROAD, PEDALANKA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521344 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 BKM,J W.P.No.4405 of 2026 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, especially the 5th respondent in not taking any action to alter the revenue records by following the due process of law upon the represenation dated 05- 11-2025 of the petitioner as unlawful. arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities. especially the 5th respondent to consider the representation dated 05-11-2025 of the petitioner and take necessary action in furthereance thereof and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent to consider representation dated 05-11- 2025 of the petitioner and to take necessary action in furtherance thereof pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUNNANGI THANMAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.4405 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. The issuance of notice to the 6th respondent is dispensed with as no prejudice would cause to her even if it is disposed of in her absence. 3. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents, especially the 5th respondent in not taking any action to alter the revenue records by following the due process of law upon the representation dated 05.11.2025 of the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents Nos.1 to 5, produces the endorsement of the 5th respondent dated 20.11.2025 acting upon the representation of the petitioner by the said authority concerned. 5. In view of the endorsement dated 20.11.2025 of the 5th respondent, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to assail the same, in accordance with law, if so warranted and if so advised. The said endorsement dated 20.11.2025 of the 5th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.4405 of 2026 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 16.02.2026 PGT