ANIL SETHI SON OF LATE SHRI R.L. SETHI v. DR. DEBASISH PRUSTY
CCP/208/2026 · 2026-02-17
Anil Kumar Upman, Sudesh Bansal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16956 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16956 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7533-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 208/2026 Anil Sethi Son of Late Shri R.L. Sethi, Aged About 68 Years, Resident of Plot No. 115, Kailashpuri, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302018 (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Dr. Debasish Prusty, Principal Secretary To The Government, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shri Siddharth Mahajan, Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
3. The State of Rajasthan through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/02/2026
1. Instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, alleging disobedience/non-compliance of the order(s) dated 30.08.2016, 31.08.2016, 12.09.2016 & 19.08.2019 passed in D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No. 930/2016 titled as Anil Sethi Vs. State of Rajasthan.
2. During course of arguments, counsel for petitioner does not dispute that after withdrawing the first contempt petition vide
order dated 25.09.2025, no cause of action has arisen, hence, counsel for petitioner does not want to press this present contempt petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
[2026:RJ-JP:7533-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-208/2026]
3. Accordingly, present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J LALIT MOHAN /2