Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16955 (JHR)

KANCHAN DEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/808/2025 · 2026-06-15

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17224-DB - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 808 of 2025 ---- 1. Kanchan Dey, aged about 37 years, Son of Prankrishna Dey, Resident of Village Masaliya, P.O. & P.S. Masaliya, District - Dumka, Jharkhand-814167. 2. Mithun Nandi, aged about 38 years, Son of Raghunath Nandi, Resident of Village - Haroraidih, P.O. & P.S. - Masalia, District - Dumka, Jharkhand-814167. 3. Prasant Kumar Yadav, aged about 44 years, Son of Sunil Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village Chandna, P.O. Kendghata, P.S. Masalia, District Dumka, Jharkhand 814167. … … Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2. Uma Shankar Singh, Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Sudhir Kumar Gupta, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kalinagar, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... ...Opp. Parties ------- CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC II For the JSSC Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv Mr. Jay Prakash, Adv -------- Order No. 03 : Dated 15th June, 2026 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, J: 1. Mr. Amritansh Vats, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the identical nature of case being Cont. Case (Civil) No. 854 of 2025 has been dismissed by the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 1st August, 2025. Therefore, submission has been 2026:JHHC:17224-DB - 2 - made that the instant case may also be disposed of in terms of that order. 2. Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel for the Opp. Party-JSSC as also learned counsel for the State has submitted that the instant case may be disposed of in terms of order dated 1st August, 2025 passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 854 of 2025. 3. This Court, having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through order dated 1st August, 2025 passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 854 of 2025, is of the view that the present case is required to be disposed of in terms of order dated 1st August, 2025 passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 854 of 2025. 4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands dismissed in terms of order dated 1st August, 2025 passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 854 of 2025, and as such disposed of. 5. Pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 15th June, 2026 Alankar/