KALACHAND GHATAK AND ANR v. DR AJOY KUMAR CHAKRABORTY AND ANR
WPCRC/34/2024 · 2026-03-20
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16955 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16955 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L. 4. March 20, 2026. MNS.
WPCRC No. 34 of 2024 in WPA No. 21887 of 2022
Kalachand Ghatak and another Vs. Dr. Siddhartha Neogi and another
Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Ms. Sabnam Sultana
…for the petitioners.
Ms. Sonal Sinha, Mr. Avishek Prasad
…for the alleged contemnors.
Mr. Suman Basu
…for the added party.
1.
Learned counsel for the alleged contemnors hands over copies of certain communications indicating that the order of this Court has been complied with in full by releasing all the amounts due to the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners agrees to such submission.
3. In the light of such compliance, although belated, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served in keeping the contempt proceedings pending.
2
4. Accordingly, WPCRC No. 34 of 2024 is discharged as infructuous.
5. Consequentially, the connected contempt application, bearing CPAN 1733 of 2023, also stands
disposed of.
6. There will be no order as to costs.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)