Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6346] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2504/2026 Rinku S/o Mathuralal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bharja Nadi, Police Station Malarnadungar District Sawaimadhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 11/02/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 325/2024 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for offences punishable under Sections 61(2)(a), 318(4), 319(2), 316(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS, 2023 and under Sections 66C and 66D of I.T. Act, 2008.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by the learned Magistrate. He further submits that the accused-
[2026:RJ-JP:6346] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2504/2026] petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.01.2026. He also submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, and there is no any other criminal case pending against the accused- petitioner, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and the allegations made against the accused-petitioner and more particularly the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are trialable by the learned Magistrate, so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /4