[2026:RJ-JP:7054] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 233/2026 1. Dhori Devi W/o Ravi Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Ranot, Police Station Jaluki, Bharatpur, Present District Deeg, Presently Resident Of Paramdara, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Raj.). Aadhar Card No. 4658-8976-0567 2. Ravi Gurjar Son Of Ramo, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Paramdara, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Raj.) Aadhar No. 5782-7086-9016 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg. 3. The Nodal Officer, S.p. Office, Deeg. 4. Sho Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. 5. Charni Son Of Hukmi, Resident Of Ranot, Police Station Jaluki, Bharatpur, Present District Deeg. 6. Ramjeet Son Of Charni, Resident Of Ranot, Police Station Jaluki, Bharatpur, Present District Deeg. 7. Jagannath Son Of Charni, Resident Of Ranot, Police Station Jaluki, Bharatpur, Present District Deeg. 8. Jagannath Son Of Raghuveer, Resident Of Barai, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. 9. Uganta W/o Jagannath, Resident Of Barai, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Shubham Saini, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order [2026:RJ-JP:7054] (2 of 3) [CRLW-233/2026] 13/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 12.12.2024 at Arya Samaj Vivah Mandal Trust Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Ghaziabad. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will [2026:RJ-JP:7054] (3 of 3) [CRLW-233/2026] provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /129