Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16947 (JHR)

MD. ABDUL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5380/2026 · 2026-06-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17609 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5380 of 2026 ------ Md. Abdul, aged about 26 years, son of Md. Ajju, resident of Quraishi Mohalla, Kantatoli, P.O. Ranchi G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District –Ranchi. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate : Mr. Sanket Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.91 of 2026(N) registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 21(b)/22(b)/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 1.95 gram of brown sugar which is also known as heroine which comes under small quantity. It is next submitted that from the co-accused altogether 6.4 gram of brown sugar was recovered which comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum Special Judge (NDPS), Ranchi, in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.91 of 2026(N) with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17.06.2026 Sonu/