Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16945 (JHR)

RAM SHARAN MISTRY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./657/2023 · 2026-06-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17632] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.657 of 2023 ------ Ram Sharan Mistry, aged about 76 years, son of Late Laxman Mistry, Resident of Bhojpur Colony, Chas, P.O. & P.S. – Chas, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kapildeo Prasad, son of Late Rameshwar Prasad 3. Sumitra Devi, wife of Kapildeo Prasad, 4. Usha Kumari, wife of Late Dinendra Kumar Chandrama, Daughter of Kapildeo Prasad 5. Brajesh Kumar, son of Kaipldeo Prasad All resident of Sector – 4/A, Quarter No.-2252, B.S. City, P.O. & P.S.-Sector-4, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-17-06-2026 Heard the learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 17.06.2026-Animesh/