Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16935 (JHR)

SAKIR ANSARI @ LALU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3428/2026 · 2026-06-16

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17374 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3428 of 2026 Sakir Ansari @ Lalu, son of Abdul Kadir Mian … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, APP --- 07/16.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 registered under Section 111 (i) (iii), 318 (4), 319 (2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 66(B) (C ) (D) of the Information Technology Act and Section 42 (3) (e ) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.02.2026. He has submitted that two mobiles and two sims are allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner but no victim has been identified. He submits that charge sheet has been submitted. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. Considering the custody of the petitioner and charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.09 of 2026, on the following conditions: 2026:JHHC:17374 2 (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:16.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:18.06.2026