Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1693 (KAR)

SMT. K. LALITHA v. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/2720/2024 · 2026-03-12

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14956 WP No. 2720 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2720 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. K. LALITHA W/O K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.248, 6TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560011. 2. SRI. K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O SRI N KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.248, 6TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560011. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHA MURTHY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14956 WP No. 2720 of 2024 DR. B.R. AMBEDAKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 5. THE HANUMANTHANAGAR CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS THE MANAGER, NO 7/29, 3RD MAIN, 1ST CROSS, HANUMANTHANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560019. 6. SRI. NANDISH K.H. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O K.R. HONNEGOWDA, R/AT NO 94, 3RD CROSS, 4TH PHASE, 7TH BLOCK, BSK 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU - 560085. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14956 WP No. 2720 of 2024 SRI. M.S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R6 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO NEGOTIATE WITH PETITIONERS FOR ONE TIME SETTLEMENT, DIRECT THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR ONE TIME SETTLEMENT AS PROPOSED BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT BY PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-R MEMO DATED 13/12/2019 BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT INTIMATING THE 5TH RESPONDENT, AND QUASH THE PUBLIC AUCTION SALE AND REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 30/06/2022 IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY, WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-Y. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 10.10.2022 (Annexure-X) passed by - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14956 WP No. 2720 of 2024 Respondent No. 4, inter-alia, as well as the Sale Certificate dated 30.06.2022 (Annexure-Y). 3. Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the impugned order (Annexure-X) is an appealable order. Therefore, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this writ petition. 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the competent authority/Tribunal, if so advised. In the event the petitioners approaches the Appellate Tribunal within four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, the period spent by the petitioner before this Court shall be waived off as per Section 14 of the Limitation Act. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59