Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16929 (KAR)

SUBASH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/5840/2023 · 2026-02-23

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11787 CRL.P No. 5840 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5840 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SUBASH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 2. SANJAY AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS BOTH ARE S/O M MUNISWAMY R/A 17 AND 4, ABOVE MANAPURAM GOLD FINANCE, KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, SNAJEEVININAGAR, KODIGEHALLI POST, BENGALURU- 560092. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESHWARA PRIYADHARSHINI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KODIGEHALLI POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE- 560001 Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11787 CRL.P No. 5840 of 2023 2. NATRAJ K N S/O LATE NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A NO.2618, 14TH MAIN, E - BLOCK, SAHAKAR NAGAR BENGALURU- 560092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.119/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 380, 427, 448 R/W 34 OF IPC AND THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF VII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-U AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAID CASE IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of the petition, the Police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11787 CRL.P No. 5840 of 2023 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. 4. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. 5. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 250