Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16928 (RAJ)

M/S J.J. ENGINEERING v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/2774/2026 · 2026-02-16

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7206] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2774/2026 M/s J.J. Engineering, Through Its Partner, Jagdish Prasad Dullar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Dullar, Aged About 68 Years, R/o 166, Paschim Vihar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur-302021. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary To The Government Of India, Ministry Of Defence, South Block, New Delhi- 110011. 2. Engineer-In-Chief, Engineer-In-Chiefs Branch Directorate Of Contract Management Integrated Hq Of Mod (Army). Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi-110011. 3. Chief Engineer, Headquarters, South Western Command, Jaipur-302012. 4. Garrison Engineer, Military Engineer Services, Kahtipura Road, Jaipur, 302012 5. Hq Chief Engineer, Jaipur Zone Military Engineer Services, Bani Park, Jaipur, 302006 6. Cwe Hisar, Hq Cwe Hisar, Mil Station, Hisar, Haryana, 125006 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Kant Rawat with Ms. Dhriti Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shivangshu Naval with Mr. Shubham Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/02/2026 1. After arguing at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to decide the appeal preferred by him [2026:RJ-JP:7206] (2 of 2) [CW-2774/2026] against the impugned order dated 31.12.2025, within some specified period. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents states that the appeal preferred by the petitioner/appellant will be decided by the respondents at the earliest. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 4. Taking into consideration the issue involved in the present writ petition and the prayer made therein, this Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if the respondents are directed to decide the appeal (Annexure-16), preferred by the petitioner, as early as possible. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner/appellant as early as possible, preferably within a period of ten days from today. 6. The petitioner is also directed to appear before the Appellate Authority on or before 19.02.2026. 7. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /5