Beesetti Siva Sai Venkat v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/1155/2026 · 2026-02-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16928 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16928 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010073152026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1155/2026 Between:
1. BEESETTI SIVA SAI VENKAT, S/O. B PARASURAMULU,AGE 31 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE,R/O. 5-12-90A, BURLUPETA VIZIANAGARAM,ANDHRA PRADESH 535001. 2. BEESETTI PARASURAMULU, ,S/0. B SANYASI,AGE 63 YEARS,OCC BUSINESS,R/O. 5-12-90A, BURLUPETA VIZIANAGARAM,ANDHRA PRADESH 535001. 3. BEESETTI BHRAMARAMBA, W/O. B PARASURAMULU,AGE 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O. 5-12-90A, BURLUPETA VIZIANAGARAM,ANDHRA PRADESH 535001. 4. BODDEDA DEVIKA, , W/O. B VENKATA SURYA PRAKASH,AGE 32 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O. 12-16-51/1, NEAR JAGANNADHA THEATREAGGIMANI CHETTU,ANAKAPALLI, ANDHRA PRADESH-531001
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ,THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,ANAKAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION,ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT,REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. MALLAVARAPU PRADEEP KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:
The instant Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 4 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.297 of 2025 on the file of
2 Anakapalli Town Police Station, Anakapalli for the offences under Section 85 of BNS and Section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Sri M.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the offences alleged against the Petitioners are punishable with less than seven years period of imprisonment and Police may be directed to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 35(3) of BNSS. 3. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Public Prosecutor fairly conceded the same and would submit that a direction may be given to the Police to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 35(3) of BNSS Act since the offences are punishable with an imprisonment of below seven years. 4. Considering the submissions, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with the following; a. Investigating Officer is at liberty to complete the investigation, in accordance with law. b. In the event of any coercive action sought to be taken against the Petitioners, concerned Police Authorities are directed to scrupulously follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of BNSS and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1, which is reiterated in in Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another2. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.02.2026 Note: Issue C.C today B/o. Dinesh
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
2 2026 INSC 115
3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Crl.P.No.1155 of 2026
Dt.19.02.2026
Dinesh