Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16926 (MAD)

T.Boopathi v. R.Sadheesh, IAS and 4 others

CONT P/196/2026 · 2026-03-13

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont P.No.196 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Cont P.No. 196 of 2026 Boopathi … Petitioner Versus 1. Thiru.R.Sadheesh, I.A.S., The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. Thiru.V.Chinnusamy, M.A., The Revenue Divisional Officer/LAO, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Harur. 3. Tmt.Gayathri, The Revenue Divisional Officer / LAO, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Dharmapuri. 4. Thiru.Senthil Kumar, B.E., The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, (Water Resources Organization), Mel Pennar Vadi Nila Kottam, Dharmapuri. 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P.No.196 of 2026 5. Thiru.Pothupanithilagam, The Chief Engineer, (Water Resources Organization), Chennai Region, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 6. Thiru.Atulya Misra, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary, The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to issue summons to the respondents for willful disobedience of the Court order made in W.P.No.4931 of 2024 dated 28.02.2024 and punish them under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Prem Kumar Government Advocate O R D E R This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 28.02.2024 in W.P.No.4931 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P.No.196 of 2026 order of this Court dated 28.02.2024 in W.P.No.4931 of 2024 has been complied with. In support of the same, he has produced a copy of the proceedings dated 27.11.2025 to that effect. 3. Recording the same, the Contempt Petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it is open to him to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 13.03.2026 ms 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont P.No.196 of 2026 P.VELMURUGAN, J., ms Cont P.No.196 of 2026 13.03.2026 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis