2026:JHHC:17417 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4021 of 2026 Ali Haider, Son of Kasim Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Advocate --- 05/16th June 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.09.2025 in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.123 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B/66C/66D/84(C) of I.T. Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 11101/2025 vide order dated 10.03.2025. He submits that one mobile phone and one SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and one victim is alleged to have been identified. He submits that the charge has already been framed, but at the time of rejection of B.A. No. 11101/2025, this fact has not been brought to the notice of this Court. The learned counsel has submitted that the co-accused, namely, Farid Ansari, Hasmuddin Ansari, Ranjit Das and Bishnu Kumar Das have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in B.A. No. 2162 of 2026; B.A. No. 10862 of 2025; B.A. No. 11078/2025 and B.A. No. 11338 of 2025 respectively. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:17417 2 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the custody of the petitioner and that the charge has already been framed and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.123 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 16.06.2026 Uploaded On: Mukul/-