VIKAS KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ VIKKY S/O SHRI HANSRAJ CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2462/2026 · 2026-02-10
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6543] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2462/2026 Vikas Kumar Choudhary @ Vikky S/o Shri Hansraj Choudhary, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Badi Dhani, Village Samarpura, P.s. Samod, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhana Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 10/02/2026
1. The second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 381/2025 registered at Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural for offences punishable under Sections 3(5) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023 in F.I.R. and against the order dated 03.11.2025 whereby learned Trial Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused-petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since 27.10.2025 and Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter. She further submits that none of the injury sustained by the injured Chetan has been opined to be dangerous to life. Counsel also submits that the trial of the case is likely to
[2026:RJ-JP:6543] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2462/2026] take considerable time to conclude, therefore, accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that the manner in which the offence has been committed by the petitioner is of very serious nature.
4. On perusal of the challan papers it is revealed that, when the injured Chetan was going on a motorcycle, the accused- petitioner hit by him a jeep from the back side and also run the jeep over the injured Chetan and dragged him to a 300 mtrs. road. As per injury report, injured Chetan is said to have sustained as many as nineteen injuries, out of which seven injuries have been found to be grievous in nature. Injured Chetan said to have sustained fracture in upper one-third of right fibula bone, fracture of right third and forth rib, left six and seven ribs. He has also sustained fracture of body and ala of left side sacrum. He said to have sustained fracture of bilateral superior and inferior pubic rami, displaced fracture of left acetabulum, chip fracture of right acetabulum with perisplenic collection.
5. Taking into consideration overall facts of the case, material available on record and so also the nature and number of injuries sustained by injured Chetan and the manner in which the accused-petitioner has committed the offences, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /2