Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16920 (KAR)

SMT. MANGALAMMA v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/32412/2025 · 2026-03-12

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14883 WP No. 32412 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.32412 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MANGALAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O SIDDAIAH R/AT NO.962, NAGARLE GRAMA NANJANAGUDU TALUK-571129 MYSURU DISTRICT. 2. MR. SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O SIDHAIAH UR MOLAIAH R/AT NO.962, NAGARLE GRAMA NANJANAGUDU TALUK-571129 MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER SMFC INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD., A HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT COMMERZONE IT PARK TOWER B, 1ST FLOOR, NO.111 MOUNT POONAMALLEE ROAD PORUR, CHENNAI – 600116. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14883 WP No. 32412 of 2025 BRANCH OFFICE: 1ST FLOOR, N M COMPLEX, NO.6 SERVICE ROAD, REMCO LAYOUT HAMPI NAGAR, RPC LAYOUT ADJ TO ATTIGUPPE METRO STATION VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560040. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED PRE- SALE NOTICE BEARING NO.SMFG/KAR/SEP/2025 DATED 15.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The writ petition is of the year 2025. When this matter came up before this Court on 10.03.2026 and 11.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This Court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ 12.03.2026. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14883 WP No. 32412 of 2025 Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6