1 2026:CGHC:7980 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 479 of 2026 1 - Ashish Soni S/o Mangal Prasad Soni Aged About 35 Years R/o Sarkanda VIP Colony, Laxmi Residence B- Block 201, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Dipendra Choudhary S/o P.K. Choudhary Aged About 69 Years R/o Devrikhud, Atal Awas, Front Of Satish Tent Lane Second Number House, Tahsil And District Bilaspur C.G., At Present R/o Adarsh Nagar Phase- 2 Beside Lane Of Swami Medical In Right Side Second Number Lane D, Dutta House Beside Of Mobile Tower, Devrikhud, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent : Not noticed Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 13/02/2026 1. Heard. 2. Admit. 3. The complainant/petitioner has filed this petition for extension of time for compliance of order passed by this Court. HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.02.13 16:56:55 +0530 2 4. Vide order dated 20.08.2025 passed in CRMP No. 1504/2025, the petition/appeal was disposed of in light of decision of the Supreme Court rendered in M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 and the petitioner was directed to file an appeal within a period of 30 days from 20.08.2025 before the appropriate Court which was not complied with. 5. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that due to an inadvertent bona fide mistake, the Petitioner has failed to comply with the order of this Court dated 20.08.2025; therefore, it is requested that the application may be allowed and one week’s further time may be granted for compliance with the said order. 6. Considering the fact that vide order dated 20.08.2025 passed in CRMP No. 1504/2025, the petitioner/appellant was granted 30 days time to file the appeal under the proviso of Section 372 of Cr.P.C. but about 6 months have been passed since then, and for the compliance of the order further more time is seeking by the petitioner, therefore, the CRMP is allowed, subject to the payment of a cost of Rs. 1,000/- before the concerned Legal Services Authority within one week from today and after the payment of a cost of Rs. 1,000/- the petitioner is granted one week’s further time to file an appeal before the appropriate Court. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu