Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16915 (CHH)

ANIL KUMAR KEDIA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1037/2023 · 2026-02-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7789-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1037 of 2023 1 - Anil Kumar Kedia S/o Shri Shyam Sundar Kedia Aged About 47 Years R/o Shyam Kunj, Behind Income Tax Office, Jharsugda, District : Jharsuguda, Orissa 2 - Sunil Kumar Kedia S/o Late Shyam Sundar Kedia Aged About 48 Years R/o Shyam Kunj, Behind Income Tax Office, Jharsugda, District : Jharsuguda, Orissa 3 - Gurpreet Singh Chawla S/o Keshar Singh Chawla Aged About 37 Years R/o Sarbhal Road, Behind Income Tax Office, Near Vaishnav Apartment, District : Jharsuguda, Orissa 4 - Mohan Singh S/o Rawal Singh Upveja Aged About 62 Years R/o House No. 2821, New Bus Stand Behind Hotel Guru, Govind Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Of Police Station Mana Camp Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vinish Kumar Chhabra S/o Surendra Kumar Chhabra Aged About 46 Years R/o 233, Ward No.7 Raipur Road Punjabi Para Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Surendra Kumar Chhabra S/o Haveli Ram Chhabra Aged About 67 Years R/o House No. 223 Raipur Road, Punjabi Para, Ward No.7, Bemetara, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Khusboo Naresh Dua, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 12.02.2026 1. Heard Ms. Khusboo Naresh Dua, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. 2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of CrPC seeking quashment of FIR and further consequential proceeding registered at Police Station, Mana Camp under Crime No. 117/2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120B, 34 of IPC. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the instant petition has become infructuous as the petitioners have already been acquitted by the learned trial Court. 4. In view of the same, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra