Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1691 (JHR)

NIRANJAN KRISHNA VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/922/2022 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7537 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 922 of 2022 -- Niranjan Krishna Verma, Son of Late Gopal Krishna Verma, aged about 70 years, Resident of Kamta Niwas, Mohalla- Balbhadrapur, P.O. & P.S.- Lehariasarai, District- Darbhanga Pin- 846001 (Bihar). ..........Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Dr. Manish Ranjan, father's name no known to the Petitioner, the Secretary, Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. Mr. Raghunandan Prasad Sharan, father's name no known to the Petitioner, the Engineer-in-Chief. Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District- Ranchi. 4. Mr. Brij Nandan Kumar, father's name no known to the Petitioner, the Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Drinking Water & Sanitation Circle, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. & District Dumka. 5. Govind Kachyap, father's name no known to the Petitioner, the Executive Engineer, Drinking Water & Sanitation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Drinking Water & Sanitation Sub Division. Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. & District - Sahebganj. 6. Mr. Chandra Mauli Singh, father’s name no known to the Petitioner, the Accountant General (A&E) Jharkhand, P.O & P.S - Doranda, District Ranchi .....Opposite parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : Mrs. Sunita Kumari, A.C to Sr.S.C.-II Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate -- 31/17.03.2026 Having regard to the statements made in the second show-cause, no contempt is made out. 2. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that monetary benefit has not yet been paid; accordingly, the State should ensure that the amount be 2026:JHHC:7537 2 credited in the Bank Account of the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th March, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 20/03/2026