APHC010070382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3989/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK ABDULHAMEED, S/O SHAIK MAHABOOB SAHIB, 45 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.3-2-221, CHOWDAMMA STREET, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516227 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA YSR DISTRICT- 516001 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BADVEL URBAN POLICE STATION, YSR DISTRICT-516227 4. B NAGA SUBBA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, 60 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O NEAR VEERAREDDY COLLEGE, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516227 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3989 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent in respect of chit business at the instance of the 4th respondent without any authority, without any valid reason or ground as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, highhanded, malafide and against statutory provisions and consequently direct the respondents particularly 3rd respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent in respect of chit business….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri L. J. Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent No.3 have unnecessarily interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 and have been calling the petitioner to the police station, thereby subjecting him to harassment. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. In view of the above, the respondent No.3 is directed not to call the petitioner henceforth at the behest of respondent No.4 in connection with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3989 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 27.02.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3989 of 2026 Dated 27.02.2026 324 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3989 of 2026 Date: 27.02.2026 PBS