2026:JHHC:17537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3938 of 2026 Md. Wasim Ansari @ Wasim Khan, son of Moin Uddin Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Kehkashan Afsheen, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 05/17.06.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2026 in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026, registered under Sections 64(2)(m), 78, 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66E & 67 of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2026 and charge-sheet has been submitted. She submits that it has been mentioned in the First Information Report itself that the petitioner and the victim had love relationship and it has been further alleged that certain photographs were made viral. The learned counsel submits that the victim is a married lady. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that certain photographs showing the petitioner and the victim together have been made viral. 5. The statement of the victim recorded under section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been received and allegation has been made in her statement that the petitioner has used the technique of photoshop to make certain couple photographs which have been put in the Facebook and it has been alleged that the petitioner has blackmailed the victim and made physical relationship 2026:JHHC:17537 2 with her. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the First Information Report itself reveals that there was relationship between the petitioner and the victim and the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:17.06.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:18.06.2026