Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16904 (GAU)

SRI NAVIN SINGHANIYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2616/2026 · 2026-10-13

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010226932026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2616/2026 SRI NAVIN SINGHANIYA S/O RAIKUMAR SINGHANIYA, R/O TIPLING T.E., P.S. DULIAJAN, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MS M NIROLA,MR. R S MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 14.10.2026 Heard Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned senior counsel-cum-Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. By this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page No.# 2/2 Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Sri Navin Singhaniya, has prayed for grant of pre-arrest bail in connection with P.R. Case No.596/2026 under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 arising out of Duliajan P.S. Case No.67/2026. The learned counsel for the accused applicant submits that in the instant case charge-sheet vide CS No.128/2026 has already been filed. He submits that liberty should be granted to the accused applicant to approach the jurisdictional Court. Taking into account his submissions, the instant Anticipatory Bail application is disposed of with liberty to the accused applicant to approach the jurisdictional Court for appropriate relief, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant