Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:17528] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5365 of 2026
------ Md. Aslam aged about 28 years, S/o Md. Muslim, Resident of Village – Hanwara, P.O. + P.S. – Hanwara, District- Godda
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Kabisha Goenka, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-17-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Boarijore P.S. Case No.24 of 2025 (S.T. No.445 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238 of the B.N.S., 2023.
This is the second journey of the petitioner with the self-same prayer as earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected on merit vide order dated 15.10.2025 in B.A. No.7712 of 2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile two witnesses have been examined but neither of them have stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case rather they have stated that it is Lakhan Marandi who has committed the murder of Talu Murmu @ Kailu. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.8148 of 2025 along with other allied cases. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.05.2025 as
has been mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Godda in connection with Boarijore P.S. Case No.24 of 2025 (S.T. No.445 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.06.2026-Animesh/