M/s Sri Thimmal Industries v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/4235/2026 · 2026-02-12
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16902 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16902 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010074412026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4235/2026 Between:
1. M/S SRI THIMMAL INDUSTRIES,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR GUNDUMALAGIRIJAMMAHAVING PROPOSED UNIT AT SY.NO. 103/P OF YAGNESETHAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, W/O G SHIVANANDAPPA, R/O PLOT NO.3-10-82/11-B, MUKKIDIPETA VILLAGE, HINDUPURAM MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.- 522238
2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHEEM PATNAM.-521456
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, KUMOOL.- 518005
4. THE DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER, ANANTAPURAMU- 515001
5.
THE DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
MRK,J W.P No.4235 of 2026 2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the part of respondents, more particularly the Respondent No.5 in executing the quarry lease deed in Form-G as per Letter No.l3/E-Auction-SSS/2026, dated 05.01.2026 for the land in an extent of 4.95
Flectares of YagnesethapalliVilalge, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, without any valid reason whatsoever even though I have made all the necessary payments as per Rule 12 of the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1966 and submitted all the necessary documents, as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and abdication of statutory duty apart from the violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 to execute a deed in Form-G as per Letter No.l3/E-Auction- SSS/2026, dated 05.01.2026 for the land in an extent of 4.95 Hectares of YagnesethapalliVilalge, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.5 to receive and process the documents submitted by me as per Letter No.l3/E-Auction-SSS/2026, dated 05.01.2026 and take necessary action as per law for execution of the lease deed in Form- G for the land in an extent of 4.95 Hectares of YagnesethapalliVillage, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following Order:
MRK,J W.P No.4235 of 2026 3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4235/2026
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer:
“…to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the part of respondents, more particularly the Respondent No.5 in executing the quarry lease deed in Form-G as per Letter No.13/E-Auction-SSS/2026, dated 05.01.2026 for the land in an extent of 4.95 Hectares of YagnesethapalliVilalge, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, without any valid reason whatsoever even though I have made all the necessary payments as per Rule 12 of the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1966 and submitted all the necessary documents, as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and abdication of statutory duty apart from the violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 to execute a deed in Form-G as per Letter No.13/E-Auction- SSS/2026, dated 05.01.2026 for the land in an extent of 4.95 Hectares of YagnesethapalliVilalge, Chilamathur Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District and pass such other orders…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the inadvertent mistakes occurred in the lis, he wanted to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 3. Mr. Pativada Rama Krishna, learned Government Pleader, is present and has not disputed the same. MRK,J W.P No.4235 of 2026 4
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to work out his legal remedies in accordance with law including filing of fresh writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:13.02.2026 Ksj
MRK,J W.P No.4235 of 2026 5
32 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Writ Petition No:4235 of 2026 13th February, 2026
Ksj
MRK,J W.P No.4235 of 2026 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI Writ Petition No:4235 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01.
13.02.2026 MRK,J
This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vide Separate Order)
_______ MRK,J Ksj