Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16901 (RAJ)

SHRAWAN LAL S/O KANHAIYA LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2385/2026 · 2026-02-10

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2385/2026 Shrawan Lal S/o Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Banetha, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk. (At Present In District Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Pramod Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 10/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.23/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Tonk, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2) of B.N.S. and Section(s) 4/21 of M.M.D.R. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 27.01.2026 and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Perused the material available on record and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case that [2026:RJ-JP:6317] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2385/2026] the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since 27.01.2026 but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Shrawan Lal S/o Kanhaiya Lal is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is made clear that if he is found to be involved in offence(s) of a similar nature in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /53