N SHEKAR REDDY v. S GOPINATH @ G GOPI KRISHNA VARMA
WP/6567/2024 · 2026-02-20
S R Krishna Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16900 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16900 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10924 WP No. 6567 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 6567 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
N SHEKAR REDDY S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.111, HNR LAYOUT, KAIKONDRAHALLI SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 035. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR.S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
S GOPINATH @ G GOPI KRISHNA VARMA S/O LATE GUNTUPALLI
SATHYANARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.265, TAKKELLAPADU VILLAGE, YERRAPALEM MANDAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT TELANGANA STATE-507 201.
2.
GUNTUPALLI LALITHAMBA D/O LATE GUNTUPALLI
SATHYANARAYANA RAO W/O SRIDHAR CHAVA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.402, R K PLAZA, WESTERN HILLS,
ADDAGUTTA SOCIETY, OPPOSITE TO JNTU KUKATAPALLY, HYDERABAD ANDHRA PRADESH – 500 072.
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10924 WP No. 6567 of 2024
3. BALAJI S/O LATE GUNTUPALLI
SATHYANARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.206, 3RD MAIN, MODULU PALYA, SANJIVINI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 072. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SRIPADA VENKATA JOGA RAO, ADV. FOR R1 & R3;
SRI. VENUGOPAL M.S., ADV. FOR R2)
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN OS NO. 7531/2022 AT ANNX-R PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE XXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-40) AND ii) TO SET ASIDE, THE ORDER DATED 20/02/2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE XXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-40) ON APPLICATION FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF UNDER SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, OS NO.
7531/2022, AT ANNEXURE-R.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“ (i) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the records in O.S. 7531/2022 at Annexure-R, pending on the file of the Hon’ble XXXIX Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-40) Retyped and replaced vide Court order dated 09.03.2026
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10924 WP No. 6567 of 2024
(ii) To set aside, the order dated: 20.02.2024 passed by the Hon’ble XXXIX Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-4-) on application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, in O.S.No.7531/2022, at Annexure-R.
(iii) To allow application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, in O.S.No. 7531/2022 on the file of Hon’ble XXXIX Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-40), at Annexure-S.
(iv) To pass such other order or Writ as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(v) For costs of this writ petition, in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. When the matter came up before this Court on 18.03.2024, this Court passed the following interim order:
“Issue emergent notice to the respondents.
List after service of notice.
In the meanwhile, pending disposal of the petition, the interim order dated 23.11.2022 passed by the trial court which was not extended by the impugned order, shall
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10924 WP No. 6567 of 2024
remain in force and continue to operate between the parties till the next date of hearing. In addition thereto, all further proceedings in O.S.No.7531/2022 pending on the file of XXXIX Addl.City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, are hereby stayed till the next date of hearing.
Liberty is reserved in favour of respondents to seek vacation / modification of this order.”
4. The aforesaid interim order extending the interim order dated 23.11.2022 passed by the Trial Court, continues to remain in force and operate between the parties even till today.
5. Under these circumstances, with the consent of
learned counsel for all parties, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition directing the trial Court to dispose of all the suits on merits and in accordance with law within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. In addition there to, the interim order dated 23.11.2022 passed by the trial Court in the suit shall continue to remain in force and operate between the parties till disposal of the suit without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10924 WP No. 6567 of 2024
7. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept/left open and no opinion is expressed on merits/demerits of the rival contentions.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 63