p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.4307 of 2026 Ishwar Harijan … Petitioner Mr. T. Panigrahi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL): 13.05.2026 01. 1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Kundura PS Case No. 134 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No. 1193 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Koraput for commission of offence punishable U/S.310(2) of the BNS, on the main allegation of committing dacoity from the informant and others travelling in a Hyundai Alcazar car bearing Regd. No. CG04-NT-6074 by stopping the said car and showing arms, along with co-accused persons. 2. Heard, Mr. Tarini Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing virtually and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the identification of the Petitioner in TI parade, Mr. Panigrahi volunteers to withhold bail to the Petitioner, if he is found to have been identified in TI parade in this case. 3. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, the FIR appears to have been registered against unknown persons, but it is claimed that the Petitioner has not been identified in the TI parade, however, p. 2 co-accused Kanhu Harijan @ Kamal Lochan Barik, Ganesh Harijan, Ajay Harijan, Arun Muduli @ Kiran Muduli @ Debu Muduli, Sansai Harijan, Sumeet Sahil Naik @ Sumit Sahil Nayak , Narasingh Harijan and Bhuban Harijan have already been granted bail by this Court. Besides, the Petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2025. In such circumstance and taking into account the materials so placed on record, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail, but subject to verification of his identification in TI parade. 4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and he is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 5. The benefit of this order shall not be extended to the Petitioner, if he is found to have identified in the TI parade in this case. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge Priyajit