Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16895 (JHR)

AJIT KUMAR DAS @ AJIT DAS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3564/2026 · 2026-06-17

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17580 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3564 of 2026 Ajit Kumar Das @ Ajit Das, son of Ravi Das … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP --- 06/17.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.23 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 61 (2) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 66 (B) 66 (C ) 66 (D) and 84 (C ) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – crime , Special Court, Deoghar. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted; one mobile phone and one sim card is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and 3 crime links have been found. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions are not in dispute. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – crime, Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.23 of 2026, on the 2026:JHHC:17580 2 following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:17.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:18.06.2026