1 2026:CGHC:7837 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1692 of 2026 1 - Sandeep Chaurasiya S/o Shri Sunil Kumar Chaurasiya Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Constable / G D In The Central Industrial Security Force (C I S F) Posted At S E C L Dipka, District Korba C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of India, North Block, New Delhi, Pin 110001. 2 - Director General Central Industrial Security Force, C G O Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi, Pin 110003. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 12/02 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant the petitioner the benefit of Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) from the date it became due, along with all consequential monetary benefits, including arrears. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the application submitted by the petitioner has already been returned by the department only on the ground that, it was not properly constituted and in the application, name of the wife of petitioner is also mentioned. There is also a further direction to the petitioner to submit fresh representation under his signature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the signature of the wife is also there in his representation because, the petitioner was taking treatment of his own illness. He however, submits that petitioner will submit fresh representation. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit afresh representation before the concerned authority and if such a representation is submitted by the petitioner, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.17 12:19:32 +0530