APHC010070372014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25779/2014 Between: 1.P.THIRUMALAIAH,, S/O. VENKATRAMAIAH, AGED 39 YRS., KAMAKORU VILLAGE, BALAYAPALLY MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY / UNDER THE SCHEME OF MGNREGS, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER /, PROGRAMME OFFICER UNDER THE SCHEME OF MGNREGS, MANDAL PARISHAD, BALAYAPALLI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the order of removal and further action of the respondent in not considering the representation / appeal as illegal, arbitrary unjust and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Field Assistant under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 32214 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Field Assistant under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 182270 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No. 25779 OF 2014 ORDER : 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requested time. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as the petitioner is challenging the order dated 23.07.2014, whereas the final orders were passed vide proceedings dated 13.10.2014, which are not under challenge in the present writ petition. 3. Recording the submissions, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to challenge the impugned proceedings dated 13.10.2014 by filing an appropriate writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 3 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.25779 OF 2014 Dated 09.03.2026 KGM