Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16890 (PAT)

Shashi Anand Gautam v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29586/2026 · 2026-05-12

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29586 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2024 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Shashi Anand Gautam S/O Madan Yadav @ Madan Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Shivnandpur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. 2. Madan Yadav @ Madan Prasad Yadav S/O Late Bhuneshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Shivnandpur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. 3. Neelam Devi W/O Madan Yadav @ Madan Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Shivnandpur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the petition, filed for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, stood rejected, vide order dated 21.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11584 of 2025. 3. This application does not reveal any change of circumstances or new ground. 4. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anrs reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29586 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T