Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16883 (AP)

NARAHARASETTI MANGAKUMARI @ G MANGAKUMARI v. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED

WP/5009/2022 · 2026-02-11

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: APHC010073762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5009/2022 Between: 1. NARAHARASETTI MANGAKUMARI @ G MANGAKUMARI, D/O N. VISWANADHA RAO (LATE), AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O NEW BANK COLONY, KOTHAPETA VILLAGE, KOTHAPETA MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, CORPORATE OFFICE, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION ::2:: LIMITED, OPERATIONS CIRCLE, WEST GODAVARI AT ELURU 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, OPERATIONS CIRCLE, EAST GODAVARI AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM 5. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, OPERATIONS CIRCLE, NIDADAVOLE, WEST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order or Directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring as illegal and arbitrary, the inaction of the Respondents considering appointing the Petitioner to any suitable post, under the compassionate grounds or any other schemes, and it further consequentially prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint the Petitioner to any suitable post, and if necessary by framing a suitable scheme/ guidelines, duly taking into consideration the peculiar fact situations obtaining in the unfortunate cases like those of the Petitioner and duly coming to rescue of the persons like the Petitioner, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.5009 of 2022 This Court made the following ORDER: Pursuant to the letter dated 09.02.2026 addressed by Ms. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel for the petitioner, to the Registry, this writ petition is listed today under the caption “for withdrawal”. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition inter alia stating that no cause survives for further adjudication in the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J DT: 12.02.2026 krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.5009 of 2022 DT: 12.02.2026 krk 60