Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16882 (CAL)

REBATI ROY MAHATO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

WPA/9316/2014 · 2026-03-11

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11/03 2026 AD-01/24 266312 NANDY (DNP) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 9316 of 2014 Rebati Roy Mahato Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. T.P. Halder, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Mondal, Advocate …...for the State 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the matter. 2. The written instruction for such purpose is kept with the record. 3. WPA 9316 of 2014 is accordingly dismissed as ‘not pressed’. 4. Parties are to act on the server copy of this order. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)