2026:JHHC:17353 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3973 of 2026 Aakash Shit, Son of Gour Shit … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Karmakar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Mohua Palit, Advocate --- 08/16th June 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Chakulia P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 76, 77, 79 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional District Judge-II, Jamshedpur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter-case between the parties. The present case is the counter blast of Chakulia P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 lodged by the petitioner against the brothers of the alleged victim of the present case. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 28.07.2025. He submits that there is nothing on record to link the petitioner with recovered video. However, on 12.05.2026, a submission was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although there is an allegation that video was made viral, but nothing was recovered during investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer and has referred to the counter-affidavit and also to the case-diary and submitted that the photograph of the victim was found in the social media 2026:JHHC:17353 2 on instagram ID-akashkumar703. She has submitted that the materials have been collected in pendrive. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegations made against the petitioner and the fact that the video has been recovered and there is an allegation that nude photographs of the victim were circulated on social media, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is rejected. 5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 16.06.2026 Uploaded On: Mukul/-