Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1687 (UTT)

SAJID v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/23/2026 · 2026-02-23

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1176 BA1 No.23 of 2026 Sajid ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., 1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.1243 of 2025 under Section 8/22 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar during the pendency of trial before the court below. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the contraband, which has been recovered from the applicant, is weighing of 52.2 gram which is non-commercial quantity; he submits that mandatory provision of the NDPS Act has not been complied with; applicant is a poor person; applicant has no previous criminal antecedent. He further submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 06.12.2025. 6. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the Applicant-Sajid be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 23.02.2026 Arti