JAGITA MANHAS AND ANR v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER HOME DEPTT
WP(C)/1841/2026 · 2026-07-06
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1687 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1687 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.1841/2026 CM No. 4063/2026
Jagita Manhas & Anr …..Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (06.07.2026)
01. Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 03.06.2026 and same is the position today as well. Thus, inference can be drawn that the petitioners have not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
02. Dismissed for non prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
06.07.2026
Vijay
S. No. 15 Vijay Kumar 2026.07.06 18.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document