HEMCHANDRA DAN ALIAS HEM CHANDRA DAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5367/2026 · 2026-06-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16868 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:17526] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5367 of 2026
------ Hemchandra Dan @ Hem Chandra Dan, aged about 52 years, son of Anil Chandra Dan, Resident of Village Tilabani, P.O. – Bardohi, P.S. – Govindpur, District- Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Gaurav Kishore, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-17-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sessions Trial Case No.296 of 2026 arising out of Barwadda P.S. Case No.284 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310 (2) of the B.N.S.,
2023.
This is the second journey of the petitioner with the self-same prayer as earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 13.03.2026 in B.A. No.1874 of 2026.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted 95 bags of ferrule materials. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner as has been mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the
petitioner has been in custody since 23.12.2025 as has been mentioned para- 20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-VII, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Trial Case No.296 of 2026 arising out of Barwadda P.S. Case No.284 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.06.2026-Animesh/