Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16867 (JHR)

ROHIT KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3906/2026 · 2026-06-16

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17404 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3906 of 2026 Rohit Kumar Yadav son of Rukdev Prasad Yadav … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Birat Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, APP --- 04/16.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2026 having no criminal antecedent. One mobile and one SIM Card alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He also submits that during investigation one victim could be identified and charge sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. Learned counsel for the State submits that there are 26 complaints, however, only one victim has been identified. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- ( 2026:JHHC:17404 ) 2 II-cum-Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 16.06.2026 Uploaded on 18.06.2026 Binit/